Favourites Create PDF Email Print

Are we now under Martial Law? Or Military Rule? A Military Dictatorship? Who is doing this? Who is behind it? Why are they doing this?

Date added:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
Last revised:
Friday, 06 November 2009
2 Favour


Yes.  We are clearly right now under Military Rule.

A coup de tas has occurred in the United States with the Military - Industrial - Complex overthrowing and taking absolute control over all 3 Branches of the Government.

More specifically, the Departmetn of Homeland security is not what most people think it is.  This is clear in the simple fact that the Department of Homeland Security was initially going to be called the Department of Homeland "Defense" and not Homeland "Security."  This clearly is a good indicator to what was on the minds of those who moved to create the Department of Homeland Security.  Beyond this you can look to other information and changes that have been carried out to get a very good indication of what is going on behind the scenes.

A perfect example is the "United States Coast Guard" and how it is now declaring itself to be a "Special Branch of the Military" not within the Department of Defense as controlled by all of the various Civilian Secretaries and the Pentagon, but somehow operating under MILITARY LAW within the Department of Homeland Security.  This is huge in and of itself , but there is so, so much more than just this.  Effectively the "United States" has created by defect or default, another "Department of Defense" without naming it as was originalyl intended.  Remember our "Department of Defense" used to be called the "Department of War," and with what is going on it is clear that the powers and people behind this sought to reconfigure the Department of Defense back into a Department of War.  Not toward "Defense", but toward preemptive and aggressive wars in contrast to our own traditions, without any proper declaration of war by Congress and to upend the International Conventions in the form of the Geneva Conventions that have helped maintain some greater level of "peace" than might have ben seen without these accords.  The Geneva Conventions decreed that all "wars of aggression" would be illegal and would be and should be considered as crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and in fact war crimes whcih by Internaional standards were to be considered some of the most heinous crimes imaginable.

There is a difference between "martial law"; "military law"; or "military dictatorship"; and normal "civil" order.  Martial law is fleeting for just a few days, maybe a few weeks and is only intended to restore civil order and to help get the courts, police, fire department and other Public Works programs back up and running.  A pretty good primer on "Martial Law" as written by Dr. Edwin Veira can be found here; 


Although I would have to qualify certain things in this article it is a very good foundation on some of the aspects of Martial Law and how the usurpation by Military Forces of "civilian affairs" was even laid out wihin our Declaration of Independence as cited in Dr. Veira's article as follows;

"Patriotic Americans in the late 1700s thought no better of “martial law”. Here, the Declaration of Independence provides compelling evidence. As the Declaration recounted:

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.—

* * * * *
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.—

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:—

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:—
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States[.]

In this litany of the most egregious aspects of “martial law”, the worst is that “He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power”—for , if that can be done, then all the rest (and even more) will inevitably follow, inasmuch as no one will have any legal recourse against whatever the executors of “martial law” may choose to do."

That is exactly where I find myself today in my own and present predicament that I have endured for at least the past 7 years now.  This is also the key reason why I have gone to great lengths to warn and inform others about what is going on within the U.S. Coast Guard and Homeland Security as it is un-American and as foreign to our lands and our people and our ways as were the Hessen Mercenaries the Royal families of the "United Kingdoms" hired to quell the rebellion in the original 13 colonies that eveoled into and became the "United States of America."